Benchmarks Dashboard

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2015
Nature of Work: Research
3.01
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
+
Nature of Work: Service
3.35
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
 
asian
 
 
Nature of Work: Teaching
3.57
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
 
 
 
+
Facilities and Work Resources
3.13
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
 
 
+
Personal and Family Policies
3.11
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
white
+
Health and Retirement Benefits
3.52
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
foc
asian
 
+
Interdisciplinary Work
2.61
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
foc
white
urm
 
Collaboration
3.37
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Mentoring
3.39
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
foc
 
urm
+
Tenure Policies
3.47
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Tenure Expectations: Clarity
3.56
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
men
foc
asian
urm
-
Promotion to Full
3.55
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Leadership: Senior
2.91
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
white
+
Leadership: Divisional
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Leadership: Departmental
3.67
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
foc
white
urm
 
Leadership: Faculty
3.12
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
 
 
 
Governance: Trust
3.14
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
 
 
+
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose
2.98
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
white
white
white
+
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand
3.01
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
 
 
 
+
Governance: Adaptability
2.90
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
white
 
+
Governance: Productivity
3.29
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
men
 
white
 
+
Departmental Collegiality
3.91
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Departmental Engagement
3.76
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
assoc
men
foc
asian
urm
+
Departmental Quality
3.59
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Appreciation and Recognition
3.36
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
 
white
urm
+
* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
VPA
ECM
HHE
Agr
Bus
Edu
Med
Oth
Hum vs other
Soc vs other
Phy vs other
Bio vs other
VPA vs other
ECM vs other
HHE vs other
Agr vs other
Bus vs other
Edu vs other
Med vs other
Oth vs other
2015
Nature of Work: Research
3.01
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
Med
N<5
+
Nature of Work: Service
3.35
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
Phy
 
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
other
Med
N<5
 
Nature of Work: Teaching
3.57
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
 
Phy
other
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
 
 
N<5
+
Facilities and Work Resources
3.13
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
Bio
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
other
 
N<5
+
Personal and Family Policies
3.11
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
other
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
 
other
N<5
+
Health and Retirement Benefits
3.52
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
 
Phy
Bio
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
Med
N<5
+
Interdisciplinary Work
2.61
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
Bio
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
other
Med
N<5
 
Collaboration
3.37
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
 
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
other
Med
N<5
+
Mentoring
3.39
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
Edu
Med
N<5
+
Tenure Policies
3.47
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Tenure Expectations: Clarity
3.56
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
-
Promotion to Full
3.55
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
 
N<5
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Leadership: Senior
2.91
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
other
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
Edu
other
N<5
+
Leadership: Divisional
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Leadership: Departmental
3.67
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
 
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
 
N<5
 
Leadership: Faculty
3.12
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
 
 
Bio
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
 
Med
N<5
 
Governance: Trust
3.14
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
Bio
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
other
 
N<5
+
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose
2.98
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
 
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
 
Med
N<5
+
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand
3.01
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
Bio
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
 
Med
N<5
+
Governance: Adaptability
2.90
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
 
Med
N<5
+
Governance: Productivity
3.29
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
+
Departmental Collegiality
3.91
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
Phy
other
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
Med
N<5
+
Departmental Engagement
3.76
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
Phy
other
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
other
N<5
+
Departmental Quality
3.59
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
Phy
 
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
Edu
Med
N<5
 
Appreciation and Recognition
3.36
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
other
Med
N<5
+