Nature of Work  ›  Demographic Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2015
Nature of Work: Research
3.01
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
+
Time spent on research
3.13
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
 
 
+
Expectations for finding external funding
2.77
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
+
Influence over focus of research
3.82
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Quality of grad students to support research
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Support for research
2.77
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
asian
 
+
Support for engaging undergrads in research
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Support for obtaining grants (pre-award)
2.88
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Support for maintaining grants (post-award)
2.92
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
women
 
white
 
 
Support for securing grad student assistance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Support for travel to present/conduct research
2.63
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
 
 
+
Availability of course release for research
2.63
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
women
white
white
white
+
Nature of Work: Service
3.35
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
 
asian
 
 
Time spent on service
3.46
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
-
Support for faculty in leadership roles
2.95
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
white
white
 
+
Number of committees
3.60
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
 
 
 
 
Attractiveness of committees
3.56
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
men
 
 
 
 
Discretion to choose committees
3.46
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
assoc
men
foc
asian
urm
-
Equitability of committee assignments
3.10
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Number of student advisees
3.45
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
 
 
Support for being a good advisor
2.63
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
white
 
Equity of the distribution of advising responsibilities
3.29
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Nature of Work: Teaching
3.57
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
 
 
 
+
Time spent on teaching
3.95
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
white
 
Number of courses taught
3.38
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
 
 
 
+
Level of courses taught
3.63
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
 
 
white
 
Discretion over course content
3.99
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
men
foc
 
urm
 
Number of students in classes taught
3.58
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
men
foc
white
urm
+
Quality of students taught
2.94
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
 
asian
 
 
Equitability of distribution of teaching load
3.47
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
foc
 
urm
+
Quality of grad students to support teaching
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Teaching schedule
3.96
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
assoc
men
foc
 
urm
+
Support for teaching diverse learning styles
3.61
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Support for assessing student learning
3.68
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
 
asian
 
 
Support for developing online/hybrid courses
3.58
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
full
men
white
white
 
 
Support for teaching online/hybrid courses
3.60
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
 
men
 
 
 
 
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Time spent on outreach
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Time spent on administrative tasks
3.12
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
white
 
Ability to balance teaching/research/service
3.25
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
assoc
women