Institutional Leadership  ›  Demographic Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2015
Leadership: Senior
2.91
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
white
+
Pres/Chancellor: Pace of decision making
2.87
N<5
tenured
N<5
 
women
white
white
white
+
Pres/Chancellor: Stated priorities
2.93
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
white
 
Pres/Chancellor: Communication of priorities
2.84
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
white
 
CAO: Pace of decision making
2.99
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
white
white
white
+
CAO: Stated priorities
3.05
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
white
+
CAO: Communication of priorities
2.87
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
white
+
CAO: Ensuring faculty input
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Leadership: Divisional
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dean: Pace of decision making
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dean: Stated priorities
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dean: Communication of priorities
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dean: Ensuring faculty input
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Leadership: Departmental
3.67
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
foc
white
urm
 
Head/Chair: Pace of decision making
3.72
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
men
 
white
 
+
Head/Chair: Stated priorities
3.65
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
men
foc
 
urm
+
Head/Chair: Communication of priorities
3.65
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
foc
white
urm
 
Head/Chair: Ensuring faculty input
3.64
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
 
white
 
 
Head/Chair: Fairness in evaluating work
3.79
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
foc
 
urm
 
Leadership: Faculty
3.12
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
 
 
 
Faculty leaders: Pace of decision making
3.00
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
white
 
+
Faculty leaders: Stated priorities
3.17
N<5
tenured
N<5
 
 
 
 
 
 
Faculty leaders: Communication of priorities
3.13
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
asian
 
 
Faculty leaders: Ensuring faculty input
3.19
N<5
tenured
N<5
 
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Priorities are stated consistently
2.75
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
white
white
white
+
Priorities are acted on consistently
2.59
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
 
+
Changed priorities negatively affect my work
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N/A
CAO: Support in adapting to change
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Visible leadership for support of diversity
3.89
N<5
pre-ten
N<5
 
 
foc
asian
urm
+