Institutional Leadership  ›  Disciplinary Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
VPA
ECM
HHE
Agr
Bus
Edu
Med
Oth
Hum vs other
Soc vs other
Phy vs other
Bio vs other
VPA vs other
ECM vs other
HHE vs other
Agr vs other
Bus vs other
Edu vs other
Med vs other
Oth vs other
2015
Leadership: Senior
2.91
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
other
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
Edu
other
N<5
+
Pres/Chancellor: Pace of decision making
2.87
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
other
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
Edu
other
N<5
+
Pres/Chancellor: Stated priorities
2.93
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
 
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
Edu
other
N<5
 
Pres/Chancellor: Communication of priorities
2.84
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
Edu
other
N<5
 
CAO: Pace of decision making
2.99
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
other
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
other
N<5
+
CAO: Stated priorities
3.05
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
Phy
 
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
Edu
other
N<5
+
CAO: Communication of priorities
2.87
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
other
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
other
N<5
+
CAO: Ensuring faculty input
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Leadership: Divisional
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dean: Pace of decision making
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dean: Stated priorities
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dean: Communication of priorities
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dean: Ensuring faculty input
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Leadership: Departmental
3.67
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
 
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
 
N<5
 
Head/Chair: Pace of decision making
3.72
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
 
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
N<5
N<5
+
Head/Chair: Stated priorities
3.65
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
other
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
Edu
N<5
N<5
+
Head/Chair: Communication of priorities
3.65
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
 
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
N<5
N<5
 
Head/Chair: Ensuring faculty input
3.64
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
other
Phy
other
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
N<5
N<5
 
Head/Chair: Fairness in evaluating work
3.79
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
 
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
Med
N<5
 
Leadership: Faculty
3.12
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
 
 
Bio
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
 
Med
N<5
 
Faculty leaders: Pace of decision making
3.00
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
N<5
other
N<5
other
other
Med
N<5
+
Faculty leaders: Stated priorities
3.17
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
other
other
Bio
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
Edu
Med
N<5
 
Faculty leaders: Communication of priorities
3.13
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
Bio
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
other
Med
N<5
 
Faculty leaders: Ensuring faculty input
3.19
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
other
other
Bio
N<5
other
 
N<5
other
other
Med
N<5
 
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Priorities are stated consistently
2.75
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
other
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
other
N<5
+
Priorities are acted on consistently
2.59
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
 
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
Edu
other
N<5
+
Changed priorities negatively affect my work
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N/A
CAO: Support in adapting to change
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Visible leadership for support of diversity
3.89
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
other
 
N<5
ECM
HHE
N<5
other
Edu
 
N<5
+