Shared Governance  ›  Demographic Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2015
Governance: Trust
3.14
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
 
 
+
I understand how to voice opinions about policies
3.27
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Clear rules about the roles of faculty and administration
3.05
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
white
 
+
Faculty and admin follow rules of engagement
3.30
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
white
white
 
+
Faculty and admin have an open system of communication
2.97
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
white
white
white
+
Faculty and admin discuss difficult issues in good faith
3.23
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
white
+
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose
2.98
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
white
white
white
+
Important decisions are not made until there is consensus
2.71
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
white
white
white
+
Admin ensures sufficient time for faculty input
2.79
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
white
+
Faculty and admin respectfully consider the other's view
3.13
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
white
white
 
+
Faculty and admin have a shared sense of responsibility
3.35
N<5
tenured
N<5
 
women
white
white
white
+
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand
3.01
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
 
 
 
+
Faculty governance structures offer opportunities for input
3.14
N<5
 
N<5
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Admin communicate rationale for important decisions
2.89
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
white
 
+
Faculty and admin have equal say in decisions
2.96
N<5
tenured
N<5
 
 
white
white
white
+
Faculty and admin define decision criteria together
3.12
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
 
+
Governance: Adaptability
2.90
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
white
 
+
Shared governance holds up in unusual circumstances
2.94
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
 
white
 
+
Institution regularly reviews effectiveness of governance
2.88
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
 
white
white
 
+
Institution cultivates new faculty leaders
2.88
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
women
foc
 
urm
+
Governance: Productivity
3.29
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
men
 
white
 
+
Overall effectiveness of shared governance
3.13
N<5
tenured
N<5
 
 
 
asian
 
+
My committees make measureable progress towards goals
3.54
N<5
tenured
N<5
 
 
 
white
 
+
Public recognition of progress
3.19
N<5
tenured
N<5
assoc
men
white
white
 
+