Shared Governance  ›  Disciplinary Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
VPA
ECM
HHE
Agr
Bus
Edu
Med
Oth
Hum vs other
Soc vs other
Phy vs other
Bio vs other
VPA vs other
ECM vs other
HHE vs other
Agr vs other
Bus vs other
Edu vs other
Med vs other
Oth vs other
2015
Governance: Trust
3.14
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
Bio
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
other
 
N<5
+
I understand how to voice opinions about policies
3.27
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
 
N<5
+
Clear rules about the roles of faculty and administration
3.05
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
 
 
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
+
Faculty and admin follow rules of engagement
3.30
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
 
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
other
N<5
N<5
+
Faculty and admin have an open system of communication
2.97
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
Bio
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Faculty and admin discuss difficult issues in good faith
3.23
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
Bio
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
N<5
N<5
+
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose
2.98
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
 
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
 
Med
N<5
+
Important decisions are not made until there is consensus
2.71
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
other
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
N<5
Med
N<5
+
Admin ensures sufficient time for faculty input
2.79
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
Bio
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
other
 
N<5
+
Faculty and admin respectfully consider the other's view
3.13
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
Bio
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
N<5
N<5
+
Faculty and admin have a shared sense of responsibility
3.35
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
 
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
Edu
N<5
N<5
+
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand
3.01
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
Bio
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
 
Med
N<5
+
Faculty governance structures offer opportunities for input
3.14
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
 
Bio
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
 
 
N<5
+
Admin communicate rationale for important decisions
2.89
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
Bio
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
other
Med
N<5
+
Faculty and admin have equal say in decisions
2.96
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
 
other
 
N<5
ECM
HHE
N<5
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
+
Faculty and admin define decision criteria together
3.12
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
 
other
Bio
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
N<5
Edu
N<5
N<5
+
Governance: Adaptability
2.90
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
 
Med
N<5
+
Shared governance holds up in unusual circumstances
2.94
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
other
Med
N<5
+
Institution regularly reviews effectiveness of governance
2.88
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
other
 
N<5
+
Institution cultivates new faculty leaders
2.88
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
Phy
 
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
Edu
other
N<5
+
Governance: Productivity
3.29
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
 
other
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
+
Overall effectiveness of shared governance
3.13
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
 
 
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
+
My committees make measureable progress towards goals
3.54
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
Bio
N<5
ECM
other
N<5
other
other
Med
N<5
+
Public recognition of progress
3.19
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
other
Soc
 
Bio
N<5
other
other
N<5
other
N<5
N<5
N<5
+