Departmental Engagement, Quality, and Collegiality › Demographic Analysis

Analysis
Guide

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.

	Your results compared to PEERS ◄ Your results compared to COHORT ►							Areas of strength in GREEN Areas of concern in RED							Within campus differences sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
	mean	overall	tenured	pre-ten	ntt	full	assoc	men	women	white	foc	asian	urm	ten vs pre-ten	ten vs ntt	full vs assoc	men vs women	white vs foc	white vs asian	white vs urm	2015
Departmental Collegiality	3.91				N<5										N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm	+
Colleagues support work/life balance	3.96				N<5										N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm	+
Meeting times compatible with personal needs	4.17				N<5										N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm	+
Amount of personal interaction w/Pre-tenure	3.76				N<5										N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm	+
How well you fit	3.83				N<5									pre-ten	N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm
Amount of personal interaction w/Tenured	3.75				N<5										N<5	assoc		foc		urm	+
Colleagues pitch in when needed	3.87				N<5									tenured	N<5	assoc	women	foc	asian	urm	-
Department is collegial	4.00				N<5										N<5	assoc	women	foc	asian	urm
Colleagues committed to diversity/inclusion	4.13				N<5										N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm	+
Departmental Engagement	3.76				N<5									pre-ten	N<5	assoc	men	foc	asian	urm	+
Discussions of undergrad student learning	4.09				N<5									pre-ten	N<5	assoc	men	foc	asian	urm	+
Discussions of grad student learning	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Discussions of effective teaching practices	3.95				N<5									pre-ten	N<5	assoc	men	foc	asian	urm
Discussions of effective use of technology	3.69				N<5									pre-ten	N<5	assoc	men	foc	asian	urm
Discussions of current research methods	3.24				N<5									pre-ten	N<5		men		white		+
Amount of professional interaction w/Pre-tenure	3.86				N<5										N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm	+
Amount of professional interaction w/Tenured	3.86				N<5										N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm
Departmental Quality	3.59				N<5									pre-ten	N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm
Intellectual vitality of tenured faculty	3.55				N<5									pre-ten	N<5	assoc	men	foc	asian	urm
Intellectual vitality of pre-tenure faculty	3.95				N<5									pre-ten	N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm
Scholarly productivity of tenured faculty	3.41				N<5									pre-ten	N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm	+
Scholarly productivity of pre-tenure faculty	3.77				N<5									pre-ten	N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm	+
Teaching effectiveness of tenured faculty	3.64				N<5										N<5			foc	asian	urm
Teaching effectiveness of pre-tenure faculty	3.94				N<5										N<5	assoc	men	foc	asian	urm
Dept. is successful at faculty recruitment	3.53			N<5	N<5									N<5	N<5	assoc		foc		urm	-
Dept. is successful at faculty retention	3.66			N<5	N<5									N<5	N<5	assoc		foc		urm
Dept. addresses sub-standard performance	2.90				N<5									tenured	N<5	assoc			white
Related Survey Items	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--	--
Intellectual vitality of NTT faculty	3.59				N<5									pre-ten	N<5	assoc		foc	asian	urm
Scholarly productivity of NTT faculty	3.41				N<5									pre-ten	N<5		women	foc	asian	urm	+
Teaching effectiveness of NTT faculty	3.48				N<5									tenured	N<5			foc	asian	urm
Amount of professional interaction w/NTT	3.70				N<5										N<5	assoc	women	foc	asian	urm	+
Amount of personal interaction w/NTT	3.72				N<5										N<5	assoc	women	foc	asian	urm	+
Recruiting part-time faculty	2.86				N<5									tenured	N<5	assoc	men		asian
Managing part-time faculty	2.90				N<5									tenured	N<5	assoc			asian		+

CUNY - Bronx Community College

Departmental Engagement, Quality, and Collegiality › Demographic Analysis